Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 1885737 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Journal of clinical microbiology ·Vol. 29 ·No. 7 ·1991-07-00 ·Pages 1422-8

Pfaller MA, Sahm D, O'Hara C, Ciaglia C, Yu M, Yamane N, Scharnweber G, Rhoden D

Abstract

The autoSCAN-W/A (W/A; Baxter MicroScan, West Sacramento, Calif.) with the new fluorometric Rapid Neg Combo 1 (RNC) panel is a fully automated fluorometric system for identification of both enteric and nonenteric gram-negative bacilli within 2 h. We compared the W/A with the Vitek AutoMicrobic System (Vitek AMS; Vitek Systems, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) for identification of 383 clinical isolates of gram-negative bacilli. The API 20E (Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.) and conventional biochemical testing were used as the reference systems. The W/A correctly identified 336 isolates (87.7%) to the species level and classified an additional 29 isolates (7.6%) as correct with low probability (overall identification = 95.3%); the Vitek AMS correctly identified 355 isolates (92.7%) to the species level and classified an additional 8 isolates (2.1%) as correct with low probability (overall identification = 94.8%). A common set of 134 isolates of gram-negative bacilli was tested in both participating laboratories as a means of assessing interlaboratory agreement with both the W/A and the Vitek AMS. The overall agreements between the two laboratories were 86% with the W/A and 92% with the Vitek AMS. The W/A performed comparably to the Vitek AMS for identification of most gram-negative bacilli, actually exceeding the Vitek AMS for identification of nonenteric bacilli. Rapid time to identification and a high level of automation make the W/A an attractive system for clinical microbiology laboratories.

MeSH Terms
Bacteriological Techniques Enterobacteriaceae/classification,isolation & purification Evaluation Studies as Topic Fluorometry Gram-Negative Bacteria/classification,isolation & purification Humans Sensitivity and Specificity
Authors & Affiliations
8 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Pfaller M A
Iowa City Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Iowa.
Sahm D
O'Hara C
Ciaglia C
Yu M
Yamane N
Scharnweber G
Rhoden D
References (15)
15 references, click to expand
  1. Evaluation of autoscan-4 for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Aug;26(8):1586-8 PMID: 3049662
  2. Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):120-5 PMID: 7007414
  3. Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Oct;26(10):2054-8 PMID: 3182994
  4. Evaluation of the Quantum II and Rapid E identification systems.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Sep;20(3):509-14 PMID: 6386866
  5. Critical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system gram-negative identification card for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):251-7 PMID: 3517050
  6. Comparison of the Quantum II Bacterial Identification System and the AutoMicrobic System for the identification of gram-negative bacilli.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Jan;23(1):1-5 PMID: 3517034
  7. Evaluation of autoSCAN-W/A automated microbiology system for the identification of non-glucose-fermenting gram-negative bacilli.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jul;28(7):1628-34 PMID: 2199522
  8. Comparison of automated and rapid manual methods for the same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Jun;79(6):683-7 PMID: 6342361
  9. Evaluation of the updated MS-2 Bacterial Identification system in comparison with the API 20E system.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jul;18(1):128-35 PMID: 6350342
  10. Automated methods in microbiology: II. Identification and susceptibility testing.
    Am J Med Technol. 1983 May;49(5):313-21 PMID: 6349352
  11. Time-motion and cost comparison study of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional biochemical testing in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Dec;14(6):665-70 PMID: 6801085
  12. Sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the automicrobic system (with the Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical card) for identifying clinical isolates of Gram- negative bacilli.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):582-8 PMID: 7040457
  13. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Nov;12(5):659-62 PMID: 7024296
  14. The systems approach to diagnostic microbiology.
    Crit Rev Microbiol. 1981;9(1):1-44 PMID: 7028398
  15. Novel application of video image processing to biochemical and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Aug;26(8):1492-5 PMID: 3049657
Article Info
Journal
Journal of clinical microbiology
Abbr.
J Clin Microbiol
ISSN
0095-1137
Published
1991-07-00
Pages
1422-8
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7505564
PMCID
PMC270128
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]