Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 3517050 Published · ppublish English Journal Article

Critical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system gram-negative identification card for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods.

Journal of clinical microbiology ·Vol. 23 ·No. 2 ·1986-02-00 ·Pages 251-7

Plorde JJ, Gates JA, Carlson LG, Tenover FC

Abstract

During a 6-month study we critically evaluated the accuracy of the AutoMicrobic system Gram-Negative Identification Card (Vitek Systems, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) in identifying glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli by testing 419 selected isolates in parallel with a conventional reference method. Of 356 isolates included in the AutoMicrobic system profile, a total of 307 (86.2%) were correctly identified, 36 (10.1%) were not identified, and 13 (3.7%) were misidentified. Fifty-eight of 63 (92%) isolates not included in the profile were correctly reported as "unidentified organisms." Overall, if the first-choice identification was always accepted, only 18 (4.3%) isolates would have been incorrectly reported. When first-choice identifications appended with the special message "questionable biopattern" were rejected, and organisms were screened for characteristic odor and antimicrobial susceptibility before final acceptance of the AutoMicrobic system report, the number of misidentifications was reduced to 5 (1.2%). The average time to identification with the AutoMicrobic system Gram-Negative Identification Card was 15 h. This compares favorably with the 65 h required by the reference method.

MeSH Terms
Acinetobacter/classification,isolation & purification Alcaligenes/classification,isolation & purification Bacteriological Techniques Bordetella/classification,isolation & purification Computers Evaluation Studies as Topic Flavobacterium/classification,isolation & purification Gram-Negative Bacteria/classification,isolation & purification Humans Moraxella/classification,isolation & purification Pseudomonas/classification,isolation & purification Reagent Kits, Diagnostic Rhizobium/classification,isolation & purification Software
Chemicals
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Plorde J J
Gates J A
Carlson L G
Tenover F C
References (31)
31 references, click to expand
  1. Infrequently encountered Pseudomonas species causing infection in humans.
    Ann Intern Med. 1972 Aug;77(2):211-5 PMID: 4641655
  2. Epidemiology of infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Rev Infect Dis. 1984 Sep-Oct;6 Suppl 3:S627-42 PMID: 6443765
  3. Evaluation of two rapid methods for identification of commonly encountered nonfermenting or oxidase-positive, Gram-negative rods.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Dec;6(6):605-9 PMID: 338626
  4. Evaluation of a multitest system for identification of saccharolytic pseudomonads.
    Am J Clin Pathol. 1978 Jan;69(1):41-7 PMID: 339710
  5. Evaluation of the Oxi/Ferm tube system for identification of nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Jun;7(6):533-8 PMID: 353066
  6. Evaluation of the API 20E system for identification of nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Jun;7(6):539-45 PMID: 353067
  7. Laboratory evaluation of a multitest system for identification of gram-negative organisms.
    Am J Clin Pathol. 1978 Dec;70(6):914-7 PMID: 364978
  8. Accuracy and reproducibility of the Oxi/Ferm system in identifying a select group of unusual gram-negative bacilli.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Feb;9(2):180-5 PMID: 372222
  9. Comparison of the API 20E and Oxi/Ferm systems in identification of nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative bacteria.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Feb;9(2):220-6 PMID: 372226
  10. Rapid identification of nonfermentative gram-negative rods by the Corning N/F system.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Feb;9(2):239-43 PMID: 107190
  11. Nonfermentative bacilli: evaluation of three systems for identification.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Aug;10(2):147-54 PMID: 389945
  12. Comparison of the API 20E and Corning N/F systems for identification of nonfermentative gram-negative rods.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Aug;10(2):175-9 PMID: 389947
  13. Evaluation of the Minitek system for identification of nonfermentative and nonenteric fermentative Gram-negative bacteria.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Oct;12(4):509-16 PMID: 6999019
  14. In vitro susceptibilities of nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa to 32 antimicrobial agents.
    Rev Infect Dis. 1980 Nov-Dec;2(6):841-53 PMID: 7012987
  15. Four methods for identification of gram-negative nonfermenting rods: organisms more commonly encountered in clinical specimens.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Aug;12(2):271-8 PMID: 7014610
  16. Evaluation of 36 Minitek tests and a new approach for identification of nonfermenters.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Mar;13(3):572-87 PMID: 7016903
  17. Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Feb;15(2):302-7 PMID: 7040451
  18. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the automicrobic system: Enterobacteriaceae biochemical cards versus Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical cards.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):575-81 PMID: 7040456
  19. Sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the automicrobic system (with the Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical card) for identifying clinical isolates of Gram- negative bacilli.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):582-8 PMID: 7040457
  20. Comparison of the Oxi/Ferm and N/F systems for identification of infrequently encountered nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative bacilli.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):384-90 PMID: 7042743
  21. Novel approach to bacterial identification that uses the autobac system.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jun;15(6):1103-10 PMID: 7050148
  22. Accuracy and precision of the autobac system for rapid identification of Gram-negative bacilli: a collaborative evaluation.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jun;15(6):1111-9 PMID: 7050149
  23. Direct comparison of two mechanized systems for identification of gram-negative bacilli. Autobac ID system versus the auto microbic system (with EBC plus).
    Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Oct;78(4):462-70 PMID: 6753560
  24. Infections caused by Pseudomonas maltophilia with emphasis on bacteremia: case reports and a review of the literature.
    Rev Infect Dis. 1982 Nov-Dec;4(6):1236-46 PMID: 7156659
  25. Comparison of the AutoMicrobic system and a conventional tube system for identification of nonfermentative and oxidase-positive gram-negative bacilli.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jan;15(1):25-7 PMID: 6764772
  26. Use of the Autobac IDX system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Feb;19(2):301-2 PMID: 6365967
  27. Collaborative clinical evaluation of the Autobac IDX system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Apr;19(4):529-33 PMID: 6371050
  28. Evaluation of the Quantum II and Rapid E identification systems.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Sep;20(3):509-14 PMID: 6386866
  29. Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Dec;20(6):1053-9 PMID: 6520216
  30. Evaluation of the Quantum II Microbiology System for bacterial identification.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Dec;20(6):1196-7 PMID: 6394622
  31. Evaluation of the oxi/ferm tube system with selected Gram-negative bacteria.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Dec;6(6):559-66 PMID: 338624
Article Info
Journal
Journal of clinical microbiology
Abbr.
J Clin Microbiol
ISSN
0095-1137
Published
1986-02-00
Pages
251-7
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7505564
PMCID
PMC268622
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]