Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 9223264 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila.

Powell JR, Moriyama EN

Abstract

We first review what is known about patterns of codon usage bias in Drosophila and make the following points: (i) Drosophila genes are as biased or more biased than those in microorganisms. (ii) The level of bias of genes and even the particular pattern of codon bias can remain phylogenetically invariant for very long periods of evolution. (iii) However, some genes, even very tightly linked genes, can change very greatly in codon bias across species. (iv) Generally G and especially C are favored at synonymous sites in biased genes. (v) With the exception of aspartic acid, all amino acids contribute significantly and about equally to the codon usage bias of a gene. (vi) While most individual amino acids that can use G or C at synonymous sites display a preference for C, there are exceptions: valine and leucine, which prefer G. (vii) Finally, smaller genes tend to be more biased than longer genes. We then examine possible causes of these patterns and discount mutation bias on three bases: there is little evidence of regional mutation bias in Drosophila, mutation bias is likely toward A+T (the opposite of codon usage bias), and not all amino acids display the preference for the same nucleotide in the wobble position. Two lines of evidence support a selection hypothesis based on tRNA pools: highly biased genes tend to be highly and/or rapidly expressed, and the preferred codons in highly biased genes optimally bind the most abundant isoaccepting tRNAs. Finally, we examine the effect of bias on DNA evolution and confirm that genes with high codon usage bias have lower rates of synonymous substitution between species than do genes with low codon usage bias. Surprisingly, we find that genes with higher codon usage bias display higher levels of intraspecific synonymous polymorphism. This may be due to opposing effects of recombination.

MeSH Terms
Animals Codon Drosophila/genetics Evolution, Molecular Recombination, Genetic
Chemicals
Codon
Authors & Affiliations
2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Powell J R
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8106, USA. [email protected]
Moriyama E N
References (33)
33 references, click to expand
  1. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.
    Genet Res. 1966 Dec;8(3):269-94 PMID: 5980116
  2. Compilation of tRNA sequences and sequences of tRNA genes.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Jan 1;24(1):68-72 PMID: 8594604
  3. Non-Darwinian evolution: a critique.
    Nature. 1970 Mar 14;225(5237):1025-8 PMID: 5416467
  4. Analysis of tRNAs during the development of Drosophila.
    Dev Biol. 1973 Jul;33(1):185-95 PMID: 4207975
  5. An analysis of eukaryotic genomes by density gradient centrifugation.
    J Mol Biol. 1976 Nov;108(1):219-35 PMID: 826643
  6. Preferential codon usage in prokaryotic genes: the optimal codon-anticodon interaction energy and the selective codon usage in efficiently expressed genes.
    Gene. 1982 Jun;18(3):199-209 PMID: 6751939
  7. The mosaic genome of warm-blooded vertebrates.
    Science. 1985 May 24;228(4702):953-8 PMID: 4001930
  8. Diversity in G + C content at the third position of codons in vertebrate genes and its cause.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Aug 26;14(16):6345-55 PMID: 3748815
  9. The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Feb 11;15(3):1281-95 PMID: 3547335
  10. Compositional constraints and genome evolution.
    J Mol Evol. 1986;24(1-2):1-11 PMID: 3104608
  11. An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms.
    J Mol Evol. 1986;24(1-2):28-38 PMID: 3104616
  12. Correlation between molecular clock ticking, codon usage fidelity of DNA repair, chromosome banding and chromatin compactness in germline cells.
    FEBS Lett. 1987 Jun 15;217(2):184-6 PMID: 3595849
  13. Missense misreading of asparagine codons as a function of codon identity and context.
    J Biol Chem. 1987 Aug 15;262(23):11351-5 PMID: 3112158
  14. The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias.
    Mol Biol Evol. 1987 May;4(3):222-30 PMID: 3328816
  15. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms.
    Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Jan;2(1):13-34 PMID: 3916708
  16. Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome.
    Nature. 1989 Jan 19;337(6204):283-5 PMID: 2911369
  17. "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons.
    Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Nov;5(6):704-16 PMID: 3146682
  18. On the rate of DNA sequence evolution in Drosophila.
    J Mol Evol. 1989 May;28(5):398-402 PMID: 2501501
  19. Codon choice and gene expression: synonymous codons differ in translational accuracy.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Sep;86(18):6888-92 PMID: 2674938
  20. The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene.
    Gene. 1990 Mar 1;87(1):23-9 PMID: 2110097
  21. The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage.
    Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):897-907 PMID: 1752426
  22. Codon usage bias and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila.
    Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):847-58 PMID: 8349115
  23. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation.
    Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289-303 PMID: 8375663
  24. African and North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level.
    Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):548-50 PMID: 8413609
  25. Reduced natural selection associated with low recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Nov;10(6):1239-58 PMID: 8277853
  26. Relationship between expression of serendipity alpha and cellularisation of the Drosophila embryo as revealed by interspecific transformation.
    Development. 1993 Oct;119(2):471-83 PMID: 8287797
  27. Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy.
    Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):927-35 PMID: 8005445
  28. How can the low levels of DNA sequence variation in regions of the drosophila genome with low recombination rates be explained?
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 19;91(15):6815-8 PMID: 8041702
  29. The effects of mutation and natural selection on codon bias in the genes of Drosophila.
    Genetics. 1994 Aug;137(4):1049-56 PMID: 7982559
  30. Selection intensity for codon bias.
    Genetics. 1994 Sep;138(1):227-34 PMID: 8001789
  31. Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.
    Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1067-76 PMID: 7713409
  32. Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila.
    Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):261-77 PMID: 8583899
  33. Non-Darwinian evolution.
    Science. 1969 May 16;164(3881):788-98 PMID: 5767777
Article Info
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Abbr.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
ISSN
0027-8424
Published
1997-07-22
Pages
7784-90
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7505876
PMCID
PMC33704
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]