Abstract
The large-scale systematic variation in nucleotide composition along mammalian and avian genomes has been a focus of the debate between neutralist and selectionist views of molecular evolution. Here we test whether the compositional variation is due to mutation bias using two new tests, which do not assume compositional equilibrium. In the first test we assume a standard population genetics model, but in the second we make no assumptions about the underlying population genetics. We apply the tests to single-nucleotide polymorphism data from noncoding regions of the human genome. Both models of neutral mutation bias fit the frequency distributions of SNPs segregating in low- and medium-GC-content regions of the genome adequately, although both suggest compositional nonequilibrium. However, neither model fits the frequency distribution of SNPs from the high-GC-content regions. In contrast, a simple population genetics model that incorporates selection or biased gene conversion cannot be rejected. The results suggest that mutation biases are not solely responsible for the compositional biases found in noncoding regions.
MeSH Terms
Alleles
Animals
Base Composition
Evolution, Molecular
Gene Frequency
Genetics, Population
Genome, Human
Humans
Isochores/chemistry,genetics
Models, Genetic
Mutation
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Selection, Genetic
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Lercher Martin J
Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom.
[email protected]
Smith Nick G C
Eyre-Walker Adam
Hurst Laurence D
References (21)
21 references, click to expand
-
The evolution of isochores.
Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Jul;2(7):549-55
PMID: 11433361
-
Vanishing GC-rich isochores in mammalian genomes.
Genetics. 2002 Dec;162(4):1837-47
PMID: 12524353
-
The age of a neutral mutant persisting in a finite population.
Genetics. 1973 Sep;75(1):199-212
PMID: 4762875
-
Evolution of a finite population under gene conversion.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(20):6278-81
PMID: 6578508
-
Correlation between molecular clock ticking, codon usage fidelity of DNA repair, chromosome banding and chromatin compactness in germline cells.
FEBS Lett. 1987 Jun 15;217(2):184-6
PMID: 3595849
-
Directional mutation pressure and neutral molecular evolution.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Apr;85(8):2653-7
PMID: 3357886
-
Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome.
Nature. 1989 Jan 19;337(6204):283-5
PMID: 2911369
-
Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence.
Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):1161-76
PMID: 1459433
-
The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected, linked variants.
Genet Res. 1994 Jun;63(3):213-27
PMID: 8082838
-
Human coding and noncoding DNA: compositional correlations.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1996 Feb;5(1):2-12
PMID: 8673288
-
Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 22;94(15):7784-90
PMID: 9223264
-
Differentiating between selection and mutation bias.
Genetics. 1997 Dec;147(4):1983-7
PMID: 9409853
-
Influence of genomic G+C content on average amino-acid composition of proteins from 59 bacterial species.
Gene. 1997 Dec 31;205(1-2):309-16
PMID: 9461405
-
Isochore evolution in mammals: a human-like ancestral structure.
Genetics. 1998 Dec;150(4):1577-84
PMID: 9832533
-
Isochores result from mutation not selection.
Nature. 1999 Jul 1;400(6739):30-1
PMID: 10403245
-
Recent selection on synonymous codon usage in Drosophila.
J Mol Evol. 1999 Sep;49(3):343-51
PMID: 10473775
-
Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection.
Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1405-13
PMID: 10880498
-
Evidence for a high ancestral GC content in Drosophila.
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Nov;17(11):1710-7
PMID: 11070058
-
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.
Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):860-921
PMID: 11237011
-
Comparison of human genetic and sequence-based physical maps.
Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):951-3
PMID: 11237020
-
Synonymous codon bias is not caused by mutation bias in G+C-rich genes in humans.
Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Jun;18(6):982-6
PMID: 11371586