Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 21954160 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

A method for inferring the rate of occurrence and fitness effects of advantageous mutations.

Genetics ·Vol. 189 ·No. 4 ·2011-12-00 ·Pages 1427-37

Schneider A, Charlesworth B, Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD

Abstract

The distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of new mutations is of fundamental importance in evolutionary genetics. Recently, methods have been developed for inferring the DFE that use information from the allele frequency distributions of putatively neutral and selected nucleotide polymorphic variants in a population sample. Here, we extend an existing maximum-likelihood method that estimates the DFE under the assumption that mutational effects are unconditionally deleterious, by including a fraction of positively selected mutations. We allow one or more classes of positive selection coefficients in the model and estimate both the fraction of mutations that are advantageous and the strength of selection acting on them. We show by simulations that the method is capable of recovering the parameters of the DFE under a range of conditions. We apply the method to two data sets on multiple protein-coding genes from African populations of Drosophila melanogaster. We use a probabilistic reconstruction of the ancestral states of the polymorphic sites to distinguish between derived and ancestral states at polymorphic nucleotide sites. In both data sets, we see a significant improvement in the fit when a category of positively selected amino acid mutations is included, but no further improvement if additional categories are added. We estimate that between 1% and 2% of new nonsynonymous mutations in D. melanogaster are positively selected, with a scaled selection coefficient representing the product of the effective population size, N(e), and the strength of selection on heterozygous carriers of ∼2.5.

MeSH Terms
Animals Drosophila melanogaster/genetics Likelihood Functions Models, Genetic Mutation Polymorphism, Genetic Selection, Genetic
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Schneider Adrian
Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK.
Charlesworth Brian
Eyre-Walker Adam
Keightley Peter D
References (45)
45 references, click to expand
  1. Confidence interval for the number of selectively neutral amino acid polymorphisms.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6225-8 PMID: 3306673
  2. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection.
    Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1405-13 PMID: 10880498
  3. Context dependence, ancestral misidentification, and spurious signatures of natural selection.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1792-800 PMID: 17545186
  4. Molecular population genomics: a short history.
    Genet Res (Camb). 2010 Dec;92(5-6):397-411 PMID: 21429271
  5. Pervasive adaptive protein evolution apparent in diversity patterns around amino acid substitutions in Drosophila simulans.
    PLoS Genet. 2011 Feb 10;7(2):e1001302 PMID: 21347283
  6. Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.
    Genetics. 2007 Dec;177(4):2251-61 PMID: 18073430
  7. Estimating the genomewide rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.
    Genetics. 2006 Jun;173(2):821-37 PMID: 16582427
  8. Genome wide analyses reveal little evidence for adaptive evolution in many plant species.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Aug;27(8):1822-32 PMID: 20299543
  9. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods.
    J Mol Evol. 1994 Sep;39(3):306-14 PMID: 7932792
  10. On the constancy of the evolutionary rate of cistrons.
    J Mol Evol. 1971;1(1):18-25 PMID: 4377445
  11. Estimating selection on nonsynonymous mutations.
    Genetics. 2006 Feb;172(2):1079-92 PMID: 16299397
  12. Genomewide spatial correspondence between nonsynonymous divergence and neutral polymorphism reveals extensive adaptation in Drosophila.
    Genetics. 2007 Dec;177(4):2083-99 PMID: 18073425
  13. Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Sep;26(9):2097-108 PMID: 19535738
  14. On reconciling single and recurrent hitchhiking models.
    Genome Biol Evol. 2009 Sep 02;1:320-4 PMID: 20333201
  15. The distribution of fitness effects of new deleterious amino acid mutations in humans.
    Genetics. 2006 Jun;173(2):891-900 PMID: 16547091
  16. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0.
    Syst Biol. 2010 May;59(3):307-21 PMID: 20525638
  17. Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.
    Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1067-76 PMID: 7713409
  18. Genome-wide evidence for efficient positive and purifying selection in Capsella grandiflora, a plant species with a large effective population size.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Aug;27(8):1813-21 PMID: 20194429
  19. The effects of deleterious mutations on evolution in non-recombining genomes.
    Trends Genet. 2009 Jan;25(1):9-12 PMID: 19027982
  20. The rate of adaptive evolution in enteric bacteria.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Jul;23(7):1348-56 PMID: 16621913
  21. The cost of inbreeding in Arabidopsis.
    Nature. 2002 Apr 4;416(6880):531-4 PMID: 11932744
  22. Genomic patterns of adaptive divergence between chromosomally differentiated sunflower species.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Jun;26(6):1341-55 PMID: 19276154
  23. Effective population size is positively correlated with levels of adaptive divergence among annual sunflowers.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2011 May;28(5):1569-80 PMID: 20952500
  24. Bayesian analysis suggests that most amino acid replacements in Drosophila are driven by positive selection.
    J Mol Evol. 2003;57 Suppl 1:S154-64 PMID: 15008412
  25. Estimating the distribution of fitness effects from DNA sequence data: implications for the molecular clock.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 2;100(18):10335-40 PMID: 12925735
  26. The genomic rate of adaptive evolution.
    Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Oct;21(10):569-75 PMID: 16820244
  27. The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage.
    Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):897-907 PMID: 1752426
  28. Assessing the evolutionary impact of amino acid mutations in the human genome.
    PLoS Genet. 2008 May 30;4(5):e1000083 PMID: 18516229
  29. Characterizing recurrent positive selection at fast-evolving genes in Drosophila miranda and Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Genome Biol Evol. 2010 Jul 12;2:371-8 PMID: 20624741
  30. Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias.
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Apr 27;365(1544):1203-12 PMID: 20308095
  31. A flexible forward simulator for populations subject to selection and demography.
    Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 1;24(23):2786-7 PMID: 18842601
  32. Natural selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous mutations shapes patterns of polymorphism in Populus tremula.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Mar;27(3):650-60 PMID: 19837657
  33. Evidence for pervasive adaptive protein evolution in wild mice.
    PLoS Genet. 2010 Jan 22;6(1):e1000825 PMID: 20107605
  34. The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation.
    Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):929-44 PMID: 10835411
  35. Estimating the parameters of selection on nonsynonymous mutations in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. miranda.
    Genetics. 2010 Aug;185(4):1381-96 PMID: 20516497
  36. The human genome browser at UCSC.
    Genome Res. 2002 Jun;12(6):996-1006 PMID: 12045153
  37. Similar rates of protein adaptation in Drosophila miranda and D. melanogaster, two species with different current effective population sizes.
    BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Dec 18;8:334 PMID: 19091130
  38. Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.
    Nature. 2002 Feb 28;415(6875):1022-4 PMID: 11875568
  39. Estimating selection intensity on synonymous codon usage in a nonequilibrium population.
    Genetics. 2009 Oct;183(2):651-62, 1SI-23SI PMID: 19620398
  40. Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.
    Genome Res. 2007 Dec;17(12):1755-62 PMID: 17989248
  41. An approximate bayesian estimator suggests strong, recurrent selective sweeps in Drosophila.
    PLoS Genet. 2008 Sep 19;4(9):e1000198 PMID: 18802463
  42. Adaptive genic evolution in the Drosophila genomes.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 13;104(7):2271-6 PMID: 17284599
  43. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations.
    Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Aug;8(8):610-8 PMID: 17637733
  44. Correlated evolution of nearby residues in Drosophilid proteins.
    PLoS Genet. 2011 Feb;7(2):e1001315 PMID: 21383965
  45. Pervasive natural selection in the Drosophila genome?
    PLoS Genet. 2009 Jun;5(6):e1000495 PMID: 19503600
Article Info
Journal
Genetics
Abbr.
Genetics
ISSN
1943-2631
Published
2011-12-00
Epub
2011-00-27
Pages
1427-37
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
0374636
PMCID
PMC3241409
Subset
IM
Grants
Wellcome Trust · United Kingdom
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council · BB/H006109/1 · United Kingdom
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]