Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 28245811 Published · epublish English Journal Article Validation Study

RNA-protein binding motifs mining with a new hybrid deep learning based cross-domain knowledge integration approach.

BMC bioinformatics ·Vol. 18 ·No. 1 ·2017-02-28 ·Pages 136

Pan X, Shen HB

Abstract

RNAs play key roles in cells through the interactions with proteins known as the RNA-binding proteins (RBP) and their binding motifs enable crucial understanding of the post-transcriptional regulation of RNAs. How the RBPs correctly recognize the target RNAs and why they bind specific positions is still far from clear. Machine learning-based algorithms are widely acknowledged to be capable of speeding up this process. Although many automatic tools have been developed to predict the RNA-protein binding sites from the rapidly growing multi-resource data, e.g. sequence, structure, their domain specific features and formats have posed significant computational challenges. One of current difficulties is that the cross-source shared common knowledge is at a higher abstraction level beyond the observed data, resulting in a low efficiency of direct integration of observed data across domains. The other difficulty is how to interpret the prediction results. Existing approaches tend to terminate after outputting the potential discrete binding sites on the sequences, but how to assemble them into the meaningful binding motifs is a topic worth of further investigation. In viewing of these challenges, we propose a deep learning-based framework (iDeep) by using a novel hybrid convolutional neural network and deep belief network to predict the RBP interaction sites and motifs on RNAs. This new protocol is featured by transforming the original observed data into a high-level abstraction feature space using multiple layers of learning blocks, where the shared representations across different domains are integrated. To validate our iDeep method, we performed experiments on 31 large-scale CLIP-seq datasets, and our results show that by integrating multiple sources of data, the average AUC can be improved by 8% compared to the best single-source-based predictor; and through cross-domain knowledge integration at an abstraction level, it outperforms the state-of-the-art predictors by 6%. Besides the overall enhanced prediction performance, the convolutional neural network module embedded in iDeep is also able to automatically capture the interpretable binding motifs for RBPs. Large-scale experiments demonstrate that these mined binding motifs agree well with the experimentally verified results, suggesting iDeep is a promising approach in the real-world applications. The iDeep framework not only can achieve promising performance than the state-of-the-art predictors, but also easily capture interpretable binding motifs. iDeep is available at http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/iDeep.

Keywords
CLIP-seq Convolutional neural network Deep belief network Multimodal deep learning RNA-binding protein
MeSH Terms
Algorithms Binding Sites Data Mining Machine Learning Neural Networks, Computer Nucleotide Motifs Protein Binding RNA/chemistry,metabolism RNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism Sequence Analysis, RNA/methods
Chemicals
RNA-Binding Proteins RNA
Authors & Affiliations
2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Pan Xiaoyong
Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. [email protected].
Shen Hong-Bin
Institute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and Key Laboratory of System Control and Information Processing, Ministry of Education of China, Shanghai, China. [email protected].
References (35)
35 references, click to expand
  1. Revealing protein-lncRNA interaction.
    Brief Bioinform. 2016 Jan;17 (1):106-16 PMID: 26041786
  2. Towards better accuracy for missing value estimation of epistatic miniarray profiling data by a novel ensemble approach.
    Genomics. 2011 May;97(5):257-64 PMID: 21397683
  3. Orthogonal matrix factorization enables integrative analysis of multiple RNA binding proteins.
    Bioinformatics. 2016 May 15;32(10):1527-35 PMID: 26787667
  4. Analysis and prediction of DNA-binding proteins and their binding residues based on composition, sequence and structural information.
    Bioinformatics. 2004 Mar 1;20(4):477-86 PMID: 14990443
  5. GraphProt: modeling binding preferences of RNA-binding proteins.
    Genome Biol. 2014 Jan 22;15(1):R17 PMID: 24451197
  6. Identification of neuronal RNA targets of TDP-43-containing ribonucleoprotein complexes.
    J Biol Chem. 2011 Jan 14;286(2):1204-15 PMID: 21051541
  7. Ensembl 2016.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D710-6 PMID: 26687719
  8. Protein-specific prediction of mRNA binding using RNA sequences, binding motifs and predicted secondary structures.
    BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Apr 29;15:123 PMID: 24780077
  9. ViennaRNA Package 2.0.
    Algorithms Mol Biol. 2011 Nov 24;6:26 PMID: 22115189
  10. Statistical mechanical modeling of genome-wide transcription factor occupancy data by MatrixREDUCE.
    Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 15;22(14):e141-9 PMID: 16873464
  11. A compendium of RNA-binding motifs for decoding gene regulation.
    Nature. 2013 Jul 11;499(7457):172-7 PMID: 23846655
  12. DANN: a deep learning approach for annotating the pathogenicity of genetic variants.
    Bioinformatics. 2015 Mar 1;31(5):761-3 PMID: 25338716
  13. Discovery of multi-dimensional modules by integrative analysis of cancer genomic data.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Oct;40(19):9379-91 PMID: 22879375
  14. Sparse non-negative matrix factorizations via alternating non-negativity-constrained least squares for microarray data analysis.
    Bioinformatics. 2007 Jun 15;23(12):1495-502 PMID: 17483501
  15. RNAcontext: a new method for learning the sequence and structure binding preferences of RNA-binding proteins.
    PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jul 01;6:e1000832 PMID: 20617199
  16. DanQ: a hybrid convolutional and recurrent deep neural network for quantifying the function of DNA sequences.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jun 20;44(11):e107 PMID: 27084946
  17. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator.
    Genome Res. 2004 Jun;14(6):1188-90 PMID: 15173120
  18. Basset: learning the regulatory code of the accessible genome with deep convolutional neural networks.
    Genome Res. 2016 Jul;26(7):990-9 PMID: 27197224
  19. A deep learning framework for modeling structural features of RNA-binding protein targets.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Feb 29;44(4):e32 PMID: 26467480
  20. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks.
    Science. 2006 Jul 28;313(5786):504-7 PMID: 16873662
  21. Identification of High-Impact cis-Regulatory Mutations Using Transcription Factor Specific Random Forest Models.
    PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Nov 12;11(11):e1004590 PMID: 26562774
  22. A comprehensive comparative review of sequence-based predictors of DNA- and RNA-binding residues.
    Brief Bioinform. 2016 Jan;17 (1):88-105 PMID: 25935161
  23. PredcircRNA: computational classification of circular RNA from other long non-coding RNA using hybrid features.
    Mol Biosyst. 2015 Aug;11(8):2219-26 PMID: 26028480
  24. Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model.
    Nat Methods. 2015 Oct;12(10):931-4 PMID: 26301843
  25. Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning.
    Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Aug;33(8):831-8 PMID: 26213851
  26. DRIMust: a web server for discovering rank imbalanced motifs using suffix trees.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jul;41(Web Server issue):W174-9 PMID: 23685432
  27. Predicting protein-RNA interaction amino acids using random forest based on submodularity subset selection.
    Comput Biol Chem. 2014 Nov 13;53PB:324-330 PMID: 25462339
  28. Rapid and systematic analysis of the RNA recognition specificities of RNA-binding proteins.
    Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Jul;27(7):667-70 PMID: 19561594
  29. Deep learning.
    Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44 PMID: 26017442
  30. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions.
    Cell. 2009 Jan 23;136(2):215-33 PMID: 19167326
  31. Cluster-Buster: Finding dense clusters of motifs in DNA sequences.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3666-8 PMID: 12824389
  32. Predicting in vivo binding sites of RNA-binding proteins using mRNA secondary structure.
    RNA. 2010 Jun;16(6):1096-107 PMID: 20418358
  33. Quantifying similarity between motifs.
    Genome Biol. 2007;8(2):R24 PMID: 17324271
  34. Transcriptome-wide identification of RNA-binding protein and microRNA target sites by PAR-CLIP.
    Cell. 2010 Apr 2;141(1):129-41 PMID: 20371350
  35. IPMiner: hidden ncRNA-protein interaction sequential pattern mining with stacked autoencoder for accurate computational prediction.
    BMC Genomics. 2016 Aug 09;17:582 PMID: 27506469
Article Info
Journal
BMC bioinformatics
Abbr.
BMC Bioinformatics
ISSN
1471-2105
Published
2017-02-28
Epub
2017-00-28
Pages
136
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
100965194
PMCID
PMC5331642
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]