Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 9869957 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Defibrillation efficacy with endocardial electrodes is influenced by reductions in cardiac preload.

Strobel JS, Kay GN, Walcott GP, Smith WM, Ideker RE

Abstract

Little is known about the effects of cardiac preload and cardiac geometry on defibrillation efficacy with endocardial electrodes. We studied nine pigs implanted with an endocardial lead system in the normal and reduced preload state. In the reduced preload state, a balloon catheter was inflated in the inferior vena cava (IVC) for 20 seconds prior to the induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF). Complete occlusion of the IVC and reductions in preload were confirmed by observing deformation of the contrast-filled balloon, a reduction in cardiac size by fluoroscopy, and reductions in ventricular pressures. Biphasic shocks were delivered after 10 seconds of VF using a recursive up-down protocol. VF was induced 20 times for each preload state, and the 50% effective doses (ED50) for energy, current, and voltage were estimated by averaging all shocks for that state. At reduced preloads, energy decreased from 12.1 +/- 3.0 J (+/- SD) to 10.5 +/- 2.9 J (p < 0.01), voltage decreased from 415 +/- 51 V to 390 +/- 51 V (p < 0.05), and current decreased from 8.6 +/- 1.5 A to 7.6 +/- 1.5 A (p < 0.01), while impedance rose from 49.2 +/- 3.8 omega to 52.8 +/- 4.4 omega (p < 0.001). We conclude that reducing cardiac preload and cardiac size significantly lowers ED50 defibrillation energy, current, and voltage. This outcome may be caused directly by the decrease in blood volume as evidenced by increased impedance and/or may be due to changes in heart geometry and stretch.

MeSH Terms
Animals Electric Countershock Electric Impedance Electrodes, Implanted Heart/physiology Hemodynamics Organ Size Swine Treatment Outcome Ventricular Fibrillation/therapy
Authors & Affiliations
5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Strobel J S
Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35292-0019, USA.
Kay G N
Walcott G P
Smith W M
Ideker R E
References (31)
31 references, click to expand
  1. Electrophysiological effects of myocardial stretch and mechanical determinants of stretch-activated arrhythmias.
    Circulation. 1992 Sep;86(3):968-78 PMID: 1381296
  2. Electrophysiological effect of volume load in isolated canine hearts.
    Am J Physiol. 1989 Jun;256(6 Pt 2):H1697-706 PMID: 2735439
  3. Success rate versus defibrillation energy: temporal profile and the most efficient defibrillation threshold.
    Am Heart J. 1989 Sep;118(3):451-8 PMID: 2773769
  4. Safety and efficacy of inferior vena caval occlusion to rapidly alter ventricular loading conditions in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
    Am J Cardiol. 1987 Apr 15;59(9):937-42 PMID: 3565282
  5. Atrial response during ventricular fibrillation.
    Am Heart J. 1974 Nov;88(5):601-8 PMID: 4417647
  6. Determinants of successful nonthoracotomy cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: experience in 101 patients using two different lead systems.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Dec;22(7):1835-42 PMID: 8245336
  7. Clinical predictors of defibrillation energy requirements in patients treated with a nonthoracotomy defibrillator system. The ResQ Investigators.
    Am Heart J. 1996 Feb;131(2):257-60 PMID: 8579017
  8. Electrical threshold for defibrillation of canine ventricles following myocardial infarction.
    Am Heart J. 1974 Oct;88(4):476-81 PMID: 4413201
  9. Determination of left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationships by the conductance (volume) catheter technique.
    Circulation. 1986 Mar;73(3):586-95 PMID: 2868811
  10. Influence of cardiopulmonary bypass on internal cardiac defibrillation.
    Am J Cardiol. 1986 May 1;57(13):1194-5 PMID: 3706175
  11. Beta-adrenergic modulation of direct defibrillation energy in anesthetized dog heart.
    Am J Physiol. 1985 May;248(5 Pt 2):H674-7 PMID: 2986468
  12. Left and right ventricular dimensions during ventricular fibrillation in the dog.
    Am J Physiol. 1978 Aug;235(2):H231-6 PMID: 686190
  13. Mechanoelectrical feedback: independent role of preload and contractility in modulation of canine ventricular excitability.
    J Clin Invest. 1985 Nov;76(5):1843-50 PMID: 4056056
  14. Atrial rhythm during ventricular fibrillation in the dog.
    Circ Res. 1976 Jan;38(1):41-5 PMID: 1244227
  15. Adrenergic effects on internal cardiac defibrillation threshold.
    Am J Physiol. 1987 Sep;253(3 Pt 2):H500-6 PMID: 2820245
  16. A preliminary study of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by circumferential compression of the chest with use of a pneumatic vest.
    N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 9;329(11):762-8 PMID: 8350885
  17. A prospective, randomized evaluation of effect of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation thresholds in humans.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 May;13(6):1362-6 PMID: 2703617
  18. Epicardial mapping of ventricular defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in dogs.
    Circ Res. 1993 Jan;72(1):145-60 PMID: 8417837
  19. Influence of acute coronary artery occlusion on direct ventricular defibrillation in dogs.
    Med Instrum. 1980 Jan-Feb;14(1):23-6 PMID: 7354732
  20. Adrenergically mediated variations in the energy required to defibrillate the heart: observations in closed-chest, nonanesthetized dogs.
    Circulation. 1986 Feb;73(2):374-80 PMID: 2867836
  21. Stretch-induced arrhythmias in the isolated canine ventricle. Evidence for the importance of mechanoelectrical feedback.
    Circulation. 1990 Mar;81(3):1094-105 PMID: 1689619
  22. Internal cardiac defibrillation threshold: effects of acute ischemia.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1986 May;9(3):322-31 PMID: 2423974
  23. Relationship of left ventricular mass to defibrillation threshold for the implantable defibrillator: a combined clinical and animal study.
    Am Heart J. 1987 Aug;114(2):274-8 PMID: 3604882
  24. EFFECTS OF SODIUM PENTOBARBITAL ON ELECTRICAL AND REFLEX ACTIVATION OF THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM.
    Circ Res. 1964 Mar;14:228-35 PMID: 14133949
  25. Influence of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation energy in dogs using bidirectional pulse discharges.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Sep;11(9):1315-23 PMID: 2460837
  26. Effects of anesthesia on carotid sinus reflex control of arterial hemodynamics in the dog.
    Am J Physiol. 1980 Nov;239(5):H681-91 PMID: 7435643
  27. The effect of cardiac compression on defibrillation efficacy and the upper limit of vulnerability.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1995 May;6(5):368-78 PMID: 7551306
  28. Why do some patients have high defibrillation thresholds at defibrillator implantation? Answers from basic research.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Feb;17(2):222-39 PMID: 7513408
  29. Predictors of defibrillation energy requirements with nonepicardial lead systems.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Feb;18(2):253-60 PMID: 7731873
  30. Use of a conductance (volume) catheter and transient inferior vena caval occlusion for rapid determination of pressure-volume relationships in man.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1988;15(3):192-202 PMID: 3197110
  31. Effects of time to defibrillation and subthreshold preshocks on defibrillation success in pigs.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Feb;12(2):358-65 PMID: 2468146
Article Info
Journal
Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing
Abbr.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol
ISSN
1383-875X
Published
1997-09-00
Pages
95-102
Language
English
Region
Netherlands
NLM ID
9708966
Subset
IM
Grants
NHLBI NIH HHS · HL-42760 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]