Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 22072983 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Genome-wide crossover distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana meiosis reveals sex-specific patterns along chromosomes.

PLoS genetics ·Vol. 7 ·No. 11 ·2011-11-00 ·Pages e1002354

Giraut L, Falque M, Drouaud J, Pereira L, Martin OC, Mézard C

Abstract

In most species, crossovers (COs) are essential for the accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes at the first meiotic division. Their number and location are tightly regulated. Here, we report a detailed, genome-wide characterization of the rate and localization of COs in Arabidopsis thaliana, in male and female meiosis. We observed dramatic differences between male and female meiosis which included: (i) genetic map length; 575 cM versus 332 cM respectively; (ii) CO distribution patterns: male CO rates were very high at both ends of each chromosome, whereas female CO rates were very low; (iii) correlations between CO rates and various chromosome features: female CO rates correlated strongly and negatively with GC content and gene density but positively with transposable elements (TEs) density, whereas male CO rates correlated positively with the CpG ratio. However, except for CpG, the correlations could be explained by the unequal repartition of these sequences along the Arabidopsis chromosome. For both male and female meiosis, the number of COs per chromosome correlates with chromosome size expressed either in base pairs or as synaptonemal complex length. Finally, we show that interference modulates the CO distribution both in male and female meiosis.

MeSH Terms
Arabidopsis/genetics Base Composition/genetics Chromosome Mapping Chromosomes, Plant/genetics CpG Islands/genetics Crossing Over, Genetic DNA Transposable Elements/genetics Genes, Plant Genome, Plant Meiosis/genetics Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide Recombination, Genetic
Chemicals
DNA Transposable Elements
Authors & Affiliations
6 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Giraut Laurène
Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, UMR1318 INRA-AgroParisTech, INRA Centre de Versailles-Grignon, Versailles, France.
Falque Matthieu
Drouaud Jan
Pereira Lucie
Martin Olivier C
Mézard Christine
Conflict of Interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References (66)
66 references, click to expand
  1. Condensins regulate meiotic DNA break distribution, thus crossover frequency, by controlling chromosome structure.
    Cell. 2009 Oct 2;139(1):73-86 PMID: 19781752
  2. An evolutionary view of human recombination.
    Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Jan;8(1):23-34 PMID: 17146469
  3. Variation in recombination rate across the genome: evidence and implications.
    Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002 Dec;12(6):657-63 PMID: 12433578
  4. Local-scale patterns of genetic variability, outcrossing, and spatial structure in natural stands of Arabidopsis thaliana.
    PLoS Genet. 2010 Mar 26;6(3):e1000890 PMID: 20361058
  5. Coordinate variation in meiotic pachytene SC length and total crossover/chiasma frequency under conditions of constant DNA length.
    Trends Genet. 2003 Nov;19(11):623-8 PMID: 14585614
  6. The impact of recombination on nucleotide substitutions in the human genome.
    PLoS Genet. 2008 May 09;4(5):e1000071 PMID: 18464896
  7. Equal frequencies of recombination nodules in both sexes of the pigeon suggest a basic difference with eutherian mammals.
    Genome. 1999 Apr;42(2):315-21 PMID: 10231963
  8. The control of chiasma distribution in the locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Forskal).
    Chromosoma. 1973 Aug 27;43(3):289-328 PMID: 4747578
  9. Biased gene conversion: implications for genome and sex evolution.
    Trends Genet. 2003 Jun;19(6):330-8 PMID: 12801726
  10. MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME ORGANIZATION AND SEGREGATION IN PLANTS.
    Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1998 Jun;49:371-395 PMID: 15012239
  11. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana.
    Nature. 2000 Dec 14;408(6814):796-815 PMID: 11130711
  12. A second-generation combined linkage physical map of the human genome.
    Genome Res. 2007 Dec;17(12):1783-6 PMID: 17989245
  13. Pathways to meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana.
    New Phytol. 2011 May;190(3):523-44 PMID: 21366595
  14. [Immunofluorescent analysis of meiotic recombination and interference in the domestic cat].
    Tsitologiia. 2008;50(1):62-6 PMID: 18409370
  15. Meiotic recombination hot spots and cold spots.
    Nat Rev Genet. 2001 May;2(5):360-9 PMID: 11331902
  16. Recombination is proportional to the number of chromosome arms in mammals.
    Mamm Genome. 2001 Apr;12(4):318-22 PMID: 11309665
  17. The control of chiasma distribution.
    Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1984;38:293-320 PMID: 6545727
  18. A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome.
    Nat Genet. 2002 Jul;31(3):241-7 PMID: 12053178
  19. Two types of meiotic crossovers coexist in maize.
    Plant Cell. 2009 Dec;21(12):3915-25 PMID: 20040539
  20. A genetic linkage map for the saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus).
    BMC Genomics. 2009 Jul 29;10:339 PMID: 19640266
  21. A simple model for the influence of meiotic conversion tracts on GC content.
    PLoS One. 2011 Jan 13;6(1):e16109 PMID: 21249197
  22. Meiotic crossing-over: obligation and interference.
    Cell. 2006 Jul 28;126(2):246-8 PMID: 16873056
  23. A first-generation haplotype map of maize.
    Science. 2009 Nov 20;326(5956):1115-7 PMID: 19965431
  24. Sex: differences in mutation, recombination, selection, gene flow, and genetic drift.
    Evolution. 2007 Dec;61(12):2750-71 PMID: 17976181
  25. A fine-scale map of recombination rates and hotspots across the human genome.
    Science. 2005 Oct 14;310(5746):321-4 PMID: 16224025
  26. The road to crossovers: plants have their say.
    Trends Genet. 2007 Feb;23(2):91-9 PMID: 17208327
  27. Developmental changes in crossover frequency in Arabidopsis.
    Plant J. 2011 Feb;65(4):589-99 PMID: 21226880
  28. High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast.
    Nature. 2008 Jul 24;454(7203):479-85 PMID: 18615017
  29. General pattern of meiotic recombination in male dogs estimated by MLH1 and RAD51 immunolocalization.
    Chromosome Res. 2008;16(5):709-19 PMID: 18512122
  30. Comparative recombination rates in the rat, mouse, and human genomes.
    Genome Res. 2004 Apr;14(4):528-38 PMID: 15059993
  31. Pairing and synapsis in wild type Arabidopsis thaliana.
    Chromosome Res. 2008;16(5):701-8 PMID: 18535915
  32. Arabidopsis map-based cloning in the post-genome era.
    Plant Physiol. 2002 Jun;129(2):440-50 PMID: 12068090
  33. Two-parameter characterization of chromosome-scale recombination rate.
    Genome Res. 2009 Dec;19(12):2300-7 PMID: 19752285
  34. GC content and recombination: reassessing the causal effects for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.
    Genetics. 2009 Sep;183(1):31-8 PMID: 19546316
  35. Exceptionally high levels of recombination across the honey bee genome.
    Genome Res. 2006 Nov;16(11):1339-44 PMID: 17065604
  36. Broad-scale recombination patterns underlying proper disjunction in humans.
    PLoS Genet. 2009 Sep;5(9):e1000658 PMID: 19763175
  37. Centromeres convert but don't cross.
    PLoS Biol. 2010 Mar 09;8(3):e1000326 PMID: 20231873
  38. Male mouse recombination maps for each autosome identified by chromosome painting.
    Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Dec;71(6):1353-68 PMID: 12432495
  39. Recombinogenic effects of suppressors of position-effect variegation in Drosophila.
    Genetics. 2002 Feb;160(2):609-21 PMID: 11861565
  40. Integrative epigenomic mapping defines four main chromatin states in Arabidopsis.
    EMBO J. 2011 May 18;30(10):1928-38 PMID: 21487388
  41. The distribution and causes of meiotic recombination in the human genome.
    Biochem Soc Trans. 2006 Aug;34(Pt 4):526-30 PMID: 16856851
  42. Recombination and base composition: the case of the highly self-fertilizing plant Arabidopsis thaliana.
    Genome Biol. 2004;5(7):R45 PMID: 15239830
  43. Zip4/Spo22 is required for class I CO formation but not for synapsis completion in Arabidopsis thaliana.
    PLoS Genet. 2007 May 25;3(5):e83 PMID: 17530928
  44. Crossover interference in Arabidopsis.
    Genetics. 2002 Apr;160(4):1631-9 PMID: 11973316
  45. Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance.
    Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):681-91 PMID: 8454209
  46. Patterns of recombination and MLH1 foci density along mouse chromosomes: modeling effects of interference and obligate chiasma.
    Genetics. 2007 Jul;176(3):1453-67 PMID: 17483430
  47. Variation in human meiotic recombination.
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2004;5:317-49 PMID: 15485352
  48. Modeling interference in genetic recombination.
    Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1031-44 PMID: 7713406
  49. Comparisons with Caenorhabditis (approximately 100 Mb) and Drosophila (approximately 175 Mb) using flow cytometry show genome size in Arabidopsis to be approximately 157 Mb and thus approximately 25% larger than the Arabidopsis genome initiative estimate of approximately 125 Mb.
    Ann Bot. 2003 Apr;91(5):547-57 PMID: 12646499
  50. The evolution of sex dimorphism in recombination.
    Genetics. 2003 Feb;163(2):811-22 PMID: 12618416
  51. Crossover interference in humans.
    Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Jul;73(1):188-97 PMID: 12772089
  52. Global mapping of meiotic recombination hotspots and coldspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 10;97(21):11383-90 PMID: 11027339
  53. Inter-sex variation in synaptonemal complex lengths largely determine the different recombination rates in male and female germ cells.
    Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;107(3-4):208-15 PMID: 15467366
  54. Characterization of human crossover interference.
    Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Jun;66(6):1911-26 PMID: 10801387
  55. Meiotic chromosome pairing in the normal human female.
    Ann Hum Genet. 1985 Jul;49(3):215-26 PMID: 4073835
  56. Cytological analysis of interference in mouse meiosis.
    Methods Mol Biol. 2009;558:355-82 PMID: 19685335
  57. Sex-specific crossover distributions and variations in interference level along Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 4.
    PLoS Genet. 2007 Jun;3(6):e106 PMID: 17604455
  58. The mismatch repair protein MLH1 marks a subset of strongly interfering crossovers in tomato.
    Plant Cell. 2007 Mar;19(3):862-76 PMID: 17337626
  59. Synaptonemal complex karyotype of zebrafish.
    Heredity (Edinb). 2003 Feb;90(2):136-40 PMID: 12634819
  60. Variation in crossing-over rates across chromosome 4 of Arabidopsis thaliana reveals the presence of meiotic recombination "hot spots".
    Genome Res. 2006 Jan;16(1):106-14 PMID: 16344568
  61. Synaptosomal complexes and the organization of chromatin during meiotic prophase.
    Cell Biol Int Rep. 1992 Aug;16(8):749-60 PMID: 1446349
  62. Integrating genomics, bioinformatics, and classical genetics to study the effects of recombination on genome evolution.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jul;19(7):1181-97 PMID: 12082137
  63. A mathematical framework for examining whether a minimum number of chiasmata is required per metacentric chromosome or chromosome arm in human.
    Genomics. 2011 Mar;97(3):186-92 PMID: 21156203
  64. Recombination and mammalian genome evolution.
    Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Jun 22;252(1335):237-43 PMID: 8394585
  65. Higher recombination frequencies in female compared to male meisoses in Brassica oleracea.
    Theor Appl Genet. 1996 Mar;92(3-4):363-7 PMID: 24166258
  66. The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome.
    Genome Res. 2010 Apr;20(4):485-95 PMID: 20357052
Article Info
Journal
PLoS genetics
Abbr.
PLoS Genet
ISSN
1553-7404
Published
2011-11-00
Epub
2011-00-03
Pages
e1002354
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
101239074
PMCID
PMC3207851
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]